OK, thanks.

The feature is available on Snap 9.0.0 snapshot. The pixel spacing is visible (attached image).

grrrrr...centimetre or decimetre in english

ESA - European Space Agency

Dr Stephen Plummer
Earth Observation Applications Scientist
Science Section, Data Applications Division,
Science, Applications & Climate Dep., Directorate of EO Programmes

ESRIN
Largo Galileo Galilei, 1
00044 Frascati, RM, Italia
Stephen.Plummer@esa.int | www.esa.int

T +39 06 94180456 | M +39 348 6125087

Yeah, decimetre would be okay. But I think it is not commonly used and therefore it would be better to use centimetre. So, 50 cm instead of 5 dm.

Usually, one doesn’t want to change the aspect ratio of a scene. So different scaling in X and Y must nut necessary considered by the resampling op. But the status should be able to show different spacing. Because the level 1 data can have different spacing across and along track.

The resamping operator don’t resampling with different scaling separately along X and Y. In desktop mode, the resampling by size constrain the width and height to a similar number.

Is it the specified behaviour?
So, is it necessary to have different pixel spacings for X and Y?
What is the minimum pixel spacing (meter, decimeter, centimeter)?